|
|
| Photo ©
Elizabeth Stevenson |
Stanley Plumly
Old Heart:
Poems
W. W. Norton & Company
Interview
conducted by Craig
Morgan Teicher.
CMT: A lot of the
poems in Old Heart try to paint vivid pictures
of the natural world, but there is also always a temptation
toward mythic energies. What’s the relationship
between those two things in your work—how do
you view the relationship between a poem and experience?
I’m frankly more a
modernist than a post-modernist in that respect. I
believe the poem is a made thing, an object. I grew
up with the New Critics—I was essentially discovered
by Cleanth Brooks. The idea of the poem as independent
of its author seems to me to be the only way autobiographical
content can work. That’s how transformation
actually happens, through agencies like metaphor and
archetypes—archetypes are big to me.
I feel like some poets are
shy of archetypes, or at least of drawing attention
to the use of them in poems, and to others, they’re
the only way to tell the truth.
I think they’re inevitable—you
can’t avoid them, and I don’t think you
have to disguise them. They’re a natural, not
an artificial part of human perception and experience.
CMT: In one poem,
you write, “It was poetry to say what it looked
like.” Would you say that’s a fair way
to describe how you think of poetry—that any
kind of comparison is poetic in nature?
It’s about resemblances,
how one thing is like another thing. To me the essence
of metaphor is that they’re both things. I often
say to students, metaphor is not something you make
up, it’s something you make from.
CMT: There are a
few places in the book where you mention about Keats,
and I know you have a book of prose about Keats on
the way. Can you talk a bit about your relationship
to Keats?
To me, he’s the first
true modern poet. Coleridge and Wordsworth are groundbreakers
and precursors, and you can find their modernism,
if you will, in different poems, but in terms of a
poet actually treating the poem as a self reflexive
entity, that is to say separate from the self—and
for whom the subject is the poem itself—he is
the original. The odes in particular are the template
for modernism. The new critics first fell in love
with him for that reason.
CMT: And, on the
subject of poetry in America in general: do you think
plenty of people are still falling in love with it?
Poetry I think is read fairly
across the board in this country. At least people
pay attention to the poets. I think more people read
poetry than buy it, which is a funny kind of disconnect.
CMT: And what would
mean to you to win the National Book Award?
It’s a very good
group of people. It would mean, I suppose an elevation
of recognition. You just get a kind of attention you
wouldn’t receive otherwise. It’s good
for those around you, those people who published you.
It’s a happy event for a book.
Craig
Morgan Teicher's poems, essays, and reviews have appeared
in many publications, including, The Paris Review,
The Yale Review, Bookforum, and Poets &
Writers. His first book, Brenda Is In The Room
And Other Poems won the 2007 Colorado Prize for
Poetry and is due out this November. He works as an
editor at Publishers Weekly.
TOP
|