Aleksandar Hemon
The Lazarus Project
Riverhead Interview
conducted by Bret
Anthony Johnston.
Bret Anthony Johnston:
First, congratulations on being a finalist for the National
Book Award! How did the news reach you? What was your
reaction?
Aleksandar
Hemon:Thank you. I was told to call the NBF
and then they told me over the phone. What can I tell
you, I was happy. I was even happier when I found out
that Reginald Gibbons, a close friend and fellow Chicagoan
was a poetry finalist.
BAJ: While visiting
Chicago in 1992, your native Sarajevo came under siege
and you were unable to return home. You adopted English
late in life, and wrote your first story in English
in 1995. How has leaving your homeland and learning
a new language affected your writing?
AH:
Well, that’s like asking: “How
has your birth affected your life?” I decided
to attempt writing in English because it seemed to me
at the time it would be the only language I could ever
write in. I have since started writing in Bosnian (I
write a bi-weekly column for a magazine in Sarajevo),
but when the war began, I felt entirely and painfully
cut off from my native language. I realized I would
live in the US for a long time, probably for the rest
of my life, and that English should therefore be the
language of the rest of my life.
BAJ: How long did you work on the novel before
it was published? What is your writing process? Did
working on The Lazarus Project feel any different
than working on your previous books?
AH:
It is hard for me to measure the time
I spent on the novel. Between the conception--which
I don’t remember, but can vaguely date--and the
submission of the manuscript six years passed. But in
those six years a lot of things happened. I can’t
remember the date of my putting the pen on the paper.
And then I took long breaks from Lazarus, wrote stories
(which amounted to a collection called Love and
Obstacles, forthcoming in 2009). My writing process
is chaotic, unsystematic, best described as wandering
in the dark, bumping into things, hurting myself, until
I one day figure out where I might be, and then try
to get out of it. But I could not get out of Lazarus
until I finished. With my previous books, which I wrote
piecemeal, I could get out when I finished a piece then
go back in when I was ready again. This all sounds like
authorly mystification, because it is. Nabokov said
that “in art, purpose and plan are nothing, only
the result counts.”
BAJ: What was the most difficult aspect of writing
the novel?
AH:
Stringing the sentences together. You
have to keep going. I always want to quit, always look
for a way to quit, to get out.
BAJ: The central incident of The Lazarus
Project is the 1908 murder of Lazarus Averbuch
by Chicago’s police chief. Averbuch, a Jewish
immigrant, hadn’t even been in the country a year
before he was shot and killed. What about the story
moved you to write? And what determined that the story
should be told as fiction rather than nonfiction?
AH:
The sadness of the story was moving.
And the photos, most of all: the photos of the dead
Lazarus sitting in a chair, with a cheap suit thrown
on him and a gloating police captain behind him. I don’t
write nonfiction. A lot of nonfiction is just lazy fiction.
BAJ: An interesting similarity among the fiction
finalists this year is how all of the novels focus on
the past. What is it about the past that so captivates
readers and writers?
AH:
Well, it is in the nature of the novel--you
can’t have a live broadcast of a novel. And writing
is not streaming. As soon as you complete a sentence
it enters the past. Besides, the past is what we need
to regain: the present is ubiquitous and oppressive,
because it wants to be the only thing.
BAJ: You’ve included a series of black
and white photographs in the narrative and you’ve
sewn them directly into the plot of the novel. Was that
part of your original conception of the book or did
that aspect of the story emerge as you wrote or researched
the book?
AH:
Well, as soon as I saw the photos of
Lazarus in the book that I used as the source (“An
Accidental Anarchist” by Joe Krauss and Walter
Roth) I wanted to find a way to include them in the
book. Velibor Boovic, who did the contemporary
photos in the book, is a great photographer and my closest
friend--he sees what I feel--so I wanted him to be involved
in a book. Before I even started writing, he and I went
to Eastern Europe, on a kind of a research trip. I already
knew there would be two story lines and photos in the
book, so he took 1,200 photos or so and I worked with
them as I was writing. I don’t take notes--the
photos were my notes.
BAJ: For some writers, the engine that powers their
fiction is character. For others, it’s language.
For others still, the engine might loosely be called
“theme.” Do you identify with any of those?
AH:
I suppose I have several engines running
at the same time.
BAJ: Who is your ideal
reader?
AH:
I am, a combination of me at the time
of writing and me as a young man who devoured books
reading 8-10 hours a day. But the writing “I”
vanishes the moment I finish writing, and the young
man is no longer young.
BAJ: What books or
writers do you find yourself rereading? Do you see any
of their influence in your current work?
AH:
Nabokov, Chekhov, Danilo Kiš, Michael
Ondaatje. There are many writers who I return to, a
lot of poets. There are influences all over.
BAJ: We’re in
an election year. The country is engaged in two wars.
The economy is all but collapsing. Other wars are being
waged around the world. The environment is suffering
on every front. In light of all of these pressures,
why does fiction matter?
AH:
Beats me.
But, with all due respect,
it’s a silly question. Why does anything matter
at a time like this? Why would eating a strawberry matter?
Should I stop loving my wife because there are suicide
bombers blowing themselves up? Has Shakespeare been
cancelled because George Bush is an alliterate fool?
Is the end of Lehman Brothers supposed to be the end
of art and humankind? Also, was there ever a time without
war, suffering, poverty and pestilence, a time when
fiction could fully matter because we were all sufficiently
relaxed to read a book? When was that? I must have missed
it.
I feel no need to make
a case for literature. Love it or leave it.
Bret
Anthony Johnston is the author of internationally acclaimed
Corpus
Christi: Stories
and the editor of Naming
the World,
both from Random House. In 2006, he received the “5
Under 35” fiction honor from the National
Book Foundation. He holds an MFA from the Iowa Writers’
Workshop, and is currently the Director of Creative
Writing at Harvard University. For more information,
please visit: www.bretanthonyjohnston.com.
TOP
|