 |
Norman
Mailer
Photo Credit: Robin Platzer/Twin Images |
NORMAN MAILER:
It’s a curious night. First I was cursing
Larry Ferlinghetti because he was saying all
the things that I’m going to say and
then I was being honored by Toni Morrison
whose gift, I think, was to show me, since
she was talking about me, her gift was to
show me that I am obtuse about women. [Laughter]
Which reminded me of my wife because my wife
can hear 50 paeans of praise and one small
criticism and all she will ever remember is
the small criticism.
So I’m obtuse about women but wary
of them. At any rate, I thank Toni Morrison
for her prodigious generosity. On my best
days, I have that high an opinion of myself
but not on my worst ones.
Now, here comes the speech, the speech
for which I cursed Ferlinghetti. Something
interesting happened with this speech on
the way to the occasion which is that I
forgot it. We were ten minutes away from
my home and I shrieked and said to my wife
and one of my sons, “We have to go
back. We have to go back. I put my speech
in the wrong suit jacket.” It never
happened to me before. May it never happen
to me again.
All right. In these years, I’m feeling
the woeful emotions of an old carriage maker
as he watches the disappearance of his trade
before the onrush of the automobile. The
serious novel may soon be in danger of being
adored with the
 |
Harold
Augenbraum and Norman Mailer
Photo Credit: Robin Platzer/Twin Images
|
same poignant concern we feel for endangered
species. There is all but unspoken shame
in the literary world today. The passion
readers used to feel for venturing into
a serious novel has withered. Indeed, how
many of you even in this audience do not
obtain more pleasure from an egregiously
cruel review of a good novel in the New
York Times than from the art involved in
reading that good but serious book?
Meanwhile, we are told that literacy is
improving and more novels are being read
than ever before. That may be true. It is
just that the vast majority of such successful
fiction is all too forgettable. The purpose
of a great novel is not, however, to cater
to one’s passing needs but to enter
one’s life, even alter it. So the
great novel will kill no time on airplane
trips. They are not good page turners. They
are in danger of becoming a footnote to
our technological, cybernetic and advertising
worlds.
 |
|
Alberto Vitale and
Norman Mailer
Photo Credit: Robin Platzer/Twin Images
|
Nature’s rude beast has appropriated
the marketplace. The good serious novel, and
most certainly, the rare great novel, is now
inimical to the needs of this marketplace.
The most dedicated novels of the future are
lucky, therefore, to have the same lack of
relation to the ambitions and greed of the
world as fine poetry offers today. So too
will the serious novel be seen as doing little
harm provided it is kept on that high shelf
we save for family whatnots. If these
gloomy predictions are correct, let us look
at least at what we may be losing. Civilization
has become a dangerous vehicle, hurtling toward
a fate that could be dire. Is it not by now
a giant who can no longer see? It is too blind
in its ambitions and blind in its wars. Its
great limbs do not coordinate with each other.
Theology is one of those limbs, is helpless
before the unanswered questions of the holocaust,
even as formal religion insists on an all
good and all powerful God. While fundamentalists
are gung ho in their manic rush to godly judgment,
liberals are in a state of woe before their
increasing powerlessness.
 |
Norris
and Norman Mailer
Photo Credit: Robin Platzer/Twin Images
|
The great light of the Enlightenment which
fortified their sense of entitlement over
the last three centuries is now a flickering
light. The military would do well to become
familiar with the works of Max Ernst or Salvador
Dalí since war has become surrealist.
What then can a great novel offer such
a world? It is possible that the novelist,
if his or her talent is deep, may even unravel
enigmas that major disciplines are not ready
to approach. Our field, our ground, our illumination
does not derive from disciplines which have
hardened over the centuries to advancing one
chosen field of inquiry at the expense of
others. We are bound to no discipline but
the development of our own experience or,
if we are fortunate enough to find it, our
vision. So a gifted few may even be ready
to explore experience far into moral advances
that are not available to other professions.
On the other hand, novelists are rarely
heroic. Gawky, half formed, shy, perverse,
spoiled, vain in their youth, so too can
their vision be astigmatic. Nonetheless,
the best do look to honor the profound demands
of their profession by offering insights
with which good
 |
|
Judith
Miller and Norman Mailer
Photo Credit: Robin Platzer/Twin Images
|
readers can enrich themselves on the meaning
of their lives. Whose comprehension of society
is not more incisive after reading Proust?
Who does not know more about language once
James Joyce is encountered? Who says that
compassion has not been deepened by living
in Tolstoy’s novels?
So where are the future Tolstoys, the future
Joyces, Dostoevskys, Prousts? In the interim,
let me salute the award winners who are yet
to be honored on this evening. May they startle
us with the breadth and power of their vision.
May there be a Theodore Dreiser or a Herman
Melville among them. I would say thank you
for this award you are giving me tonight and
I would add one coda: Would the English nation
have been as great in surviving without Shakespeare?
Would Ireland be entering a period of prosperity
today if not for James Joyce? Thank you.
 |
|
Audience at the 2005 National
Book Awards Ceremony
Photo Credit: Robin Platzer/Twin Images |
[Prolonged applause]