|
Richard Wilbur
Winner of the 1957
POETRY AWARD for
THINGS OF THIS WORLD
When a poet is being a poet -- that is, when he is
writing or thinking about writing -- he cannot be concerned
with anything but the making of a poem. If the poem
is to turn out well, the poet cannot have thought of
whether it will be saleable, or of what its effect on
the world should be; he cannot think of whether it will
bring him honor, or advance a cause, or comfort someone
in sorrow. All such considerations, whether silly or
generous, would be merely intrusive; for, psychologically
speaking, the end of writing is the poem itself. As
Robert Frost put it, "The fact is the sweetest dream
that labor knows."
There are many callings in which the need for an exclusive
concern for the thing itself is obvious. If a shoemaker
were making me a pair of shoes, I would not want him
to think as he worked of his social role or of his reputation;
I'd want him to stick to his task. If I ever had to
go under the surgeons' knife, I would want the surgeon
to think only of surgery.
And yet, of course, poetry is a deeply social thing
-- radically and incorrigibly social. It is only the
obliquity, the indirectness of its sociality that make
it seem otherwise. It is true that the poet does not
directly address his neighbors; but he does address
a great congress of persons who dwell at the back of
his mind, a congress of all those who have taught him
and whom he has admired; that constitute his ideal audience
and his better self. To this congress the poet speaks
not of peculiar and personal things, but of what in
himself is most common, most anonymous, most fundamental,
most true of all men. And he speaks not in private grunts
and mutterings but in the public language of the dictionary,
of literary tradition, and of the street. Writing poetry
is talking to oneself; yet it is a mode of talking to
oneself in which the self disappears; and the products
something that, though it may not be for everybody,
is about everybody.
Writing poetry, then, is an unsocial way of manufacturing
a thoroughly social product. Because he must shield
his poetry in its creation, the poet, more than other
writers, will write without recognition. And because
his product is not in great demand, he is likely to
look on honors and distinctions with the feigned indifference
of the wallflower. Yet of course he is pleased when
recognition comes; for what better proof is there that
for some people poetry is still a useful and necessary
thing -- like a shoe.
|